Some people think that because children find subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult, they ought to be optional instead of compulsory.
To what extent do you agree?
Looking from an educational perspective, certain subjects in modern school curriculum, such as mathematics or philosophy, are found to be complex for young learners and these subjects are believed to be options rather than compulsory subjects. Personally, I totally concur with this statement.
For a variety of reason, mathematics or philosophy have become difficult to understand for the young. To begin with, some children reveal that mathematics is incredibly difficult for them mainly because it requires logical thinking, which is used to solve equations and questions. Hence, for those who were not born with numerical intelligence, it would take a lot of time and effort for these young ones to partially comprehend math. Regarding philosophy, it is beyond children’s ability to understand because philosophy involves questioning the existence of all entities. As a result, it is impossible for a large number of youngsters to absorb the knowledge related to philosophy theories.
Apart from the abovementioned practical concerns, I hold a firm belief that abstract subjects such as mathematics or philosophy should be an option for children to learn at school. To explain, not all young ones are blessed with innate talents in which they are able to cope with numerical problems. Therefore, forcing children to learn these subjects can somehow bring a profound impact on their efficiency. For instance, there are a number of private schools in Vietnam allow children to pursue the subjects that they are passionate. Ultimately, once these children are given free choices, they are able to fully flourish with their own talents and subsequently accomplish remarkable achievement.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that young students should be allowed to choose whether they want to learn subjects, such as mathematics or philosophy, as these subjects are considered difficult.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-28 | trikhung777 | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | hoakhanhminh | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-31 | nfseg | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | eyraen | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | janeyackerman | 56 | view |
- Some people say that the most important thing about being rich is that it gives you the opportunity to give back To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- In the future it is expected that the proportion of older people will be higher than that of young people in many developed countries What are the positive or negative effects of this development 11
- the chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 61
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- In many countries people do not recycle waste materials such as paper glass and cans What are the reasons for this What could be done to solve this problem 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ties. As a result, it is impossible for a large number of youngsters to absorb the knowledge rela...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, apart from, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58163265306 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08229520892 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581632653061 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2642533218 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.230769231 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24254190425 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870753404785 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617522949846 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15340813977 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166112868583 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.