Some people think that being able to communicate with others online is breaking down geographical barriers and enabling people, who would normally never have the chance to meet, to communicate. What are the advantages of international communication online? Are there any disadvantages?
Some people have regarded the flair to interact with others on online platforms focal as it penetrates geographical demarcation and instigates conversations among international citizens. Although versatile, online communication also poses minuses and merits, whether latent or conspicuous.
On the one hand, there are pernicious drawbacks that make people concerned over the way the youth converse under the aegis of the Internet. The interpersonal skills of youngsters are detrimentally menaced since they center on using online networking sites, limiting face-to-face conversations as well as minimizing interactions with people in the vicinity of their neighborhood. This trend, therefore, aggravates relationships with relatives and family members. Some can gainsay that the Internet boosts children’s communication abilities; however, there is an egregiously striking contrast between online and reality with which teenagers should come to terms while they confine themselves in a sequestered space. Moreover, today, young adults are likely to run a higher risk of contracting health issues such as eye strain, myopia, and lack of agility, which boils down to getting exposed too much to computers and sitting fixated in one place for a long time. Should these problems not be resolved immediately, their constitutions are to worsen.
On the other hand, the ability to communicate with people from all around the world also yields salutary advantages regardless of the abovementioned risks. Firstly, it can be a unique form of tutelage. Adolescents can make inroads in honing their language skills exchanging information and discussing issues ranging from collective hazards facing the world to family affairs. Also, if they travel abroad, the chance of being provided with accommodations from their online friends is higher. Secondly, this approach helps them delve deeper into diverse cultures. That I used to talk with an Indonesian guy via Discord is a point in case. After a series of informative exchanges, I collated more data about one of the biggest peninsulas, not just the tip of the iceberg but also its zeitgeist and deep-rooted prejudices. And I believe that other users have the same experience as mine that will reinforce their knowledge.
To encapsulate, there are pros and cons of this predilection that people need to weigh up to make sure they know how to utilize online platforms right.
- The graphs below show the Expenditure on Health Education UAE as percentages of GDP and Infant mortality and life expectancy Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below Write at least 150 words 78
- One of the major problems facing the world today is the growing number of refugees The developed nations in the world should tackle this problem by taking more refugees To what extent do you agree with this opinion 89
- People suggest increasing taxes on processed products to improve people s health What do you think 89
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics Describe the information shown below in your own words What implications do the indicators have for the countries You should write at le 11
- some people say that cellphones have improved humans life Others believe that cell phones have caused problems 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'gainsays'.
Suggestion: gainsays
... relatives and family members. Some can gainsay that the Internet boosts children’s com...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53369272237 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05243896391 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644204851752 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9807462203 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.764705882 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256603320821 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709300413357 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671290537702 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162290750153 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073627001791 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.