Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes
Whereas there is a debate about whether it is the best measure to improve road safety by increasing the limited age for driving cars or riding motorbikes, I disagree with this point of view.
On the one hand, this policy can bring benefits. Young people usually have poor experiences in controlling vehicles in dangerous situations, therefore leading to accidents and threatening the safety of other people. By increasing the minimum legal age, the government can lessen the number of accidents which detrimentally damage people's lives. Additionally, those from younger age groups often have a great desire to show off themselves, for example, high school students, therefore making driving offenses such as running red lights or not wearing helmets. Whereas young people often lack fundamental knowledge about traffic laws, Adults and older people are more aware of them, hence demonstrating that increasing limited age can be an effective measure.
Although changing the minimum age required is an efficient approach, success in improving road safety depends on a combination of factors rather than a single one. There are a myriad of reasons resulting in accidents, and this can occur at every different age. Having a new limited age for driving, in my opinion, can only reduce a minor proportion of accidents and doesn’t have long-term effects on those who refuse to obey the rules. Moreover, some solutions have also shown their feasibility, for instance, limiting speed in school areas or in the long run educating children about driving safety. It is better to imply a wide range of policies jointly, including proposing suitable minimum age to bolster efficiency.
In conclusion, increasing the minimum legal age for using transportation have positive effects on society, however, should be implemented with other potential methods instead of being utilized as the main solution to address road safety issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-09 | minh phương phạm hồng | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | letrang250191 | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-03 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
- People aim to achieve a balance between their work and personal life but few people achieve it What are the causes of the problem How to overcome it 73
- Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability Others believe that there are more important factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The chart shows the percentage of people who accessed news from 4 sources from 1995 and projection to 2025 Write at least 150 words 67
- The maps show a coastal area before and after development
- it is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and personal lives do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, I disagree with this point of view. On the one hand, this policy can bring b...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mited age can be an effective measure. Although changing the minimum age requir...
^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...s rather than a single one. There are a myriad of reasons resulting in accidents, and ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le minimum age to bolster efficiency. In conclusion, increasing the minimum le...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37417218543 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80048090565 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64238410596 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5204247524 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.25 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345102143491 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115066581434 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921831588981 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225217744966 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667405377062 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.