Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As deterioration of the environment has become increasingly destructive in recent years, some people suggest that the price of fuel should be raised to tackle the issue. I disagree with this suggestion since its drawbacks would overshadow its merits.
The primary reason is that the fuel which is often known as fossil fuel and used for powering vehicles, is rare. The quantity of the energy is limited and there are no viable replacements for them for the time being. Even though other energy sources such as electricity or hydrogen are on their way to become the main source of power for transportation, they are yet researched or initially tested due to lack of relevant infrastructure and facilities. That is why their applications in large scale seem to impractical at the moment.
Furthermore, the increment of fuel cost would have detrimental impacts upon global economy and society. This is because the role of fuel is fundamental. It contributes a large proportion to production cost of other goods. Therefore, when the price of fuel is increased, other types of merchandise are likely to go up simultaneously. This is one of the main culprits of inflation, in which the price of all commodities rise. The phenomenon in turn exerts a great budern on the less well-off individuals. This stems from the fact that fuel expenditure, is linked to the value of other basic commodities which make up their living cost. Thus, the lives of millions of people may be impacted.
In the light of these facts, if the charge of fuel went up, global economy would be effect due to the scarcity of the energy. More importantly, it would place national economies and their citizens at risk of inflating price of goods which may threaten the lives of many people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many employees may work at home the modern technology Some people claim that it can benefit only workers not employers Do you agree or disagree 67
- Companies use major sporting events to promote their products Some people think it has a negative effect on sport in general To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- If a product is good or it meets people s needs people will buy it So advertising is unnecessary and no more than entertainment Agree or disagree 89
- Government should fund scientific research rather than commercial organizations To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91919191919 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89953537261 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7206189809 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3125 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8125 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135997930841 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427818310285 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038974231538 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777030286043 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368505608298 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.