The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is a graph depicting the proportion of males and females in an Asia nation who passed their driving test in the 30-year period commenced from 1980.
From an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that after 2000, the number of people gained their driving licences was higher than that in 1980 and 1990. Additionally, the figure for men paled in comparison with women over the aforementioned period.
Considering the chart more closely, we can obtain that the percentage of women passing driving tests in the 80s' and the 90s' were almost the same with approximately 50%. Meanwhile, the gap between those datas of male was 10%, which was 28% in 1980 and 38% in 1990.
It is also worth noting that the proportion of females acquiring their driving qualifications reach the peak of 68% in the year 2000. That was also true with the figure for men when it hit the high of nearly 50%, and this data stayed unchanged until the least year of the period. Furthermore, about two thirds of women passed the driving test in 2010, which ranked second among four years of the process shown.
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- Major cities in the world are growing fast as well as their problems What are the problems that young people living in those cities are facing Suggest some solutions 73
- Since travelling abroad became relatively inexpensive more countries opened their doors for foreign tourists Is it a positive or negative trend Give your opinion and include relevant examples 89
- Nowadays there is a growing trend of private car ownership Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or environmental problems associated with this 84
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing driving tests in the 80s and the 90s were almost the same with approximately ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73684210526 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4894458661 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0237271543 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216075875203 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090828455121 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040281603914 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130936662907 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129305344993 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing driving tests in the 80s and the 90s were almost the same with approximately ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73684210526 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4894458661 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0237271543 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216075875203 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090828455121 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040281603914 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130936662907 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129305344993 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.