Parents, usually mothers, stay at home to look after their families. People believe that for this they should receive a salary from the government. Do you agree or disagree and why?
In recent years, the idea that housewives or house husbands who are not at work should be given state subsidies has gained wider public approval. From my own perspective, I firmly believe that they should not receive financial support from the local authority.
The opposition to the introduction of government financial aid is attributable to several justifications, chief of which is that the appearance of that form of assistance can promote people quitting jobs and staying home to earn money. In particular, this idea is appeal to the individuals not having stable job or no motivation to work but still desire to earn money. For example, who is between job, instead of gaining qualifications and updating their CV, they are prone to be the parasite on society by claiming children and housing benefits. A number of such lazy and opportunistic individuals should be regarded as a setback in the civilizations of society.
Another strong counterargument to implementation of the supported salary from the authority to people who do not have occupation and take care of their family is that there is a high possibility for the misuse of financial package are supposed to mitigate the financial burdens on those without an opportunity to have income. Some individuals, despite the good cause of the state subsidies, take it as pennies from heaven for personal purpose such as shopping or travelling. Consequently, the money which originally aims to buy necessity for households can be spend on luxuries and gambling.
To sum up, I wholeheartedly believe that it would not be advisable for the policy-makers to offer financial support for citizens who are housewives or house husbands because this form of assistance might lead to the laziness and dependence or might be used inappropriately.
- In some countries the number of people choosing to live by themselves is increasing rapidly in recent years Why is this the case Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Major cities in the world are growing fast as well as their problems What are the problems that young people living in those cities are facing Suggest some solutions 73
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 84
- Some believe that younger family members should be responsible for supporting older family members when they become physically mentally and financially unable to look after themselves while other people argue that this responsibility belongs to the govern 78
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...to offer financial support for citizens who are housewives or house husbands because th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, still, for example, in particular, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18213058419 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17531351761 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.5499114103 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.8 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207953523388 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742769210083 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481319417509 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118547598128 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311823066279 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...to offer financial support for citizens who are housewives or house husbands because th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, still, for example, in particular, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18213058419 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17531351761 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.5499114103 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.8 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207953523388 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742769210083 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481319417509 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118547598128 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311823066279 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.