It is universally acknowledged that “children are the leaders of tomorrow”. Currently, parents and tutors play a paramount role in success of pupils. Therefore, it is claimed that juveniles must follow the instructions of their guardians and mentors. On the flip side some masses commence that this approach makes child dependent and it is not lucrative for their further life. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my own perception.
There are manifold points to endorse the former view. First and foremost, parents and teachers are well matured and experienced of distinct life stages. They not only provide the superior guidance to children but also aware them about the right and wrong things. Thence, juveniles should obey their guardians and tutors. What is more, parents have good mutual understanding, intimacy and emotional attachment with their offspring. Therefore, they always give valuable advice to make them noble characters. On the contrary, others have conflicting views.
Numerous points can be put down to shore up the latter view. To embark with, children cannot explore their own attitude, behavior, thinking and ways of living if they have to follow guidelines of their elders. Consequently, presence of stick guidance unable them to develop independent lives. Adding to it, child may not be a good decision maker in their upcoming life under the guidance of their mentors and parents. Eventually, children should make their own decisions and should not follow their parents every time.
From my notion, both aspects hold their own significance. Undeniably, following guidelines of elder ones helps in betterment of a child. However, I still believe the negatives outcomes of the idea to obey guardians and instructors cannot underestimated. Therefore, it is advisable to juveniles to develop plans by themselves instead of asking to parents and mentors.
To recapitulate, juveniles are the future of a country. Parents and teachers should allow their offspring to make own ideas in order to make them independent successful person.
- animals are used by human beings for profit in many ways. however, some people do not agree with this use of animals. discuss both views and express your own opinion. 67
- you are unhappy with the road quality nearby your home. write a letter to complain about the same to city council.in your letterintroduce yourselfdescribe the situationsay what you want the officer to do for you. 59
- Some people think that excessive use of mobile phones and computers badly affects teenagers writing and reading skills Do you agree or disagree with the statement Give your opinion 81
- Some say all offenders should be sent to prison other argue that there are better alternatives such as community work for those who commit minor crimes Discuss both viewers and give your opinions 68
- you bought a new home recently and you want to hire an interior decorator write a letter to interior decorator seeking information about his services in your letter let him know how you came to know about his work or name specify about your home discuss y 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 346, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'parent'.
Suggestion: parent
...lans by themselves instead of asking to parents and mentors. To recapitulate, juvenile...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ake them independent successful person.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39263803681 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89450947536 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576687116564 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6855827713 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.4347826087 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1739130435 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21739130435 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165084421317 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437174323837 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328001515471 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903442674829 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032580781206 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.39 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.