Some people think that the effective way to reduce air pollution is to tax companies which cause it Others thik that there are better ways to achieve it discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that the effective way to reduce air pollution is to tax companies which cause it. Others thik that there are better ways to achieve it.discuss both views and give your opinion.

Ecological hazards are too big to be managed by an individual group or society. Presently, some people are of the opinion that, it is important to impose taxes on companies which emerge air contamination during production. However, others have conflicting view . Here I would like to throw light on both sides with my own prospective.

An ample number of points can be considered to endorse my point of view. First and foremost, it is expected from corporation's to initiate the use of eco-friendly energy sources during production process if charges are imposed on them. To demonstrate, companies will start to use LPG , wind energy and solar energy instead of using diesel and petrol which produces detrimental gases in ambience. Furthermore, efficient use of fuels and energy efficient machines may come into existence as a part of strategies and corporation will implement these policies during production process under the pressure of paying penalties. consequently, the approach of imposing taxes on organisations is supposed to be a worthwhile idea to plunge level of air contamination. There are thorny side too.

Initially, the use of private vehicles is on the elevation among people which is leading reason behind increment in air pollution. Therefore, folks must use public transportation instead of using private mode of transportation. Besides this, the role of discouraging deforestation, consumerism could be terrific to mitigate this concern.

From my notion, undeniably, the role of imposing tax on companies which produces air pollution is commendable to reduce the level of air contamination . However, the impact of other things can never be underestimated. Therefore, people and enterprises ought to take joint responsibility to nip this problem from the bud.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-10 jasu 78 view
Essays by user jasu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n. However, others have conflicting view . Here I would like to throw light on bot...
^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nstrate, companies will start to use LPG , wind energy and solar energy instead of...
^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...under the pressure of paying penalties. consequently, the approach of imposing taxes on orga...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tamination. There are thorny side too. Initially, the use of private vehicles i...
^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...to reduce the level of air contamination . However, the impact of other things can...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45126353791 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24020501997 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628158844765 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.2740924831 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164261361731 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528639365043 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675602547243 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112089398161 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657204987723 0.056905535591 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.