Some people think that employers should ensure a supportive and pleasant work environment where each employee is respected and valued equally while others think employers should focus instead on providing better facilities and equipment.
criterion of evaluating pleasant work environment varies among distinguishing groups of people. Part of the society believes that company should offer cooperative and impartial atmosphere to their workforce, whereas there is an opposing view of targeting well amenities and facilities. Both perspectives are worth considering and will be justified below.
Obviously, the quality of infrastructure as well as equipments plays a fundamental role on creating employees’ first impression, hence affecting their working attitude and efficiency. For instance, as having to travel to workplace in rush hours with traffic congestions, employees uncomfortably start their daily working days. Especially in such a hot weather which is affected by environmental problems, the capacity of them has decreased significantly. Therefore, many companies have installed air conditioners to create comfortable atmosphere and release stress formed while commuting. As the result, the productivity of the companies would certainly be improved.
However, as working for a long period, a supportive and pleasant work environment will outweigh the well-equipped one. while the former permanently provides employees with opportunities for further development and cooperation, after months, without impartial atmosphere, the latter will no longer impressed their workers. Take an example of working with an annoying boss who always shouts at his colleagues, thus forming a stressed environment. Consequently, employees will soon lost their motivation which can seriously lead to a change in their workplace, despite how good the facilities the company has provided.
In the conclusion, from all viewpoints which have been analyzed above, criterion for proper workforce varies from well-equipped to cooperative one. From my perspective, instead of emphasizing on providing good facilities and amenities, companies should focus on creating environment which positively affects their mental conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-15 | johntoanpro | 11 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | johntoanpro | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | sophia_ever | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | sophia_ever | 84 | view |
- Some people think that employers should ensure a supportive and pleasant work environment where each employee is respected and valued equally while others think employers should focus instead on providing better facilities and equipment. 84
- The pie charts below give information about world population in 1900 and 2000 78
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport City centre from 2003-2012. 84
- The bar chart shows the percentages of the UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011 68
- Some people think that employers should ensure a supportive and pleasant work environment where each employee is respected and valued equally while others think employers should focus instead on providing better facilities and equipment 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Criterion
criterion of evaluating pleasant work environment...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...nt will outweigh the well-equipped one. while the former permanently provides employe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.14695340502 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33285154725 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659498207885 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0937206584 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136805803694 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465403413185 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477918730938 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842770112988 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222141332483 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.39 12.4159519038 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.