At the outset of new millennium, tourist is great opportunity for every country not only to earn money bhut also to explore their culture in foreigners heart. It is stated that government should charge more money from foreign visitors as compare to own local people. I partially agree with this statement and my partial agreement about above lines will be articulated in upcoming paragraphs before reaching to conclusion.
It is noteworthy to mention that tourism is main income of every country. The main factor behind this circumstance is that due to visitors investing their money to vist other nation. So, it would help government to operate large amount of revenue from tourism. To cite an example, in 2018, India enjoyed superficial boon in economy conditions. Because foreigners utilised their money in India to visit several places which automaticaly appreciate Indian money. As a result, it helped India country to overcome from economy problems. Therefore, it is clear that why visitors playing pivotal role in country development.
In addition to this, authorities should not charge high price from foreign visitors owing to it may lead downward slop of visitors. Furthermore, tourist would neglect in future to visite that country which demanding high fees from them. For instance, in 2010, Uk nation established this rule that tourist must have to pay double amount of money than local people which automaticaly pose a threat to Uk with decline number visitors due to Uk country unable to generate maney from other countries. Hence, it is enough to prove that why government should not pose any high tax from tourist.
To sum up, after analysing whole points from my mind, authorities must built tourist attraction places. Local people must co-operate with tourist so, they can think to visit their country again.
- Nowadays there is an increase in social problems involving young people because more parents spent time at work than with their children To what extent do you agree or disagree Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer 56
- In many countries traditional food are being replaced by international food This is having on negative effects on both families and societies To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Many people join distance learning programmes study material post TV Internet and study at home but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefit as attending colleges or universities does 73
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010 61
- In many countries traditional food is being replaced by international fast food This has negative effects on both families and societies To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is stated that government should charge more money from foreign visitors as comp...
^^
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll be articulated in upcoming paragraphs before reaching to conclusion. It is no...
^^
Line 2, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eaching to conclusion. It is noteworthy to mention that tourism is main income o...
^^
Line 2, column 345, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...superficial boon in economy conditions. Because foreigners utilised their money in Indi...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dian money. As a result, it helped India country to overcome from economy problem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, may, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in fact, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18243243243 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62280552816 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591216216216 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1615156964 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.875 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288575066607 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848206128084 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696535474942 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176947436078 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059357980536 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.