Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own
At the present time, art is an essential part of human culture. While some citizens believe that the government should support creative artists, others argue that they should be budgeted the other organisations. This essay will examine both of these viewpoints which will deliberated below.
On the one hand, opponents of government funded on arts argue that the authority has a limited fund, which is supposedly allocated to healthcare as a crucial problem to be tackled. Regarding such issue, musicians are supposed to be independent to earn revenue sourced from joining music festivals. In addition, many artists should advisably be funded by private companies which support any local art organizations. Habitat for Humanity, a non-profit organization, provides the artwork to stimulate the human mind and promotes the respect of human rights. Hence, it allows people to imagine a new future and dream up new realities to bring them more social humanism.
On the other hand, proponents of this view opine that certain people who are professional artists highly introduce cultural artworks of a country. For example, Paris - well-known reputation as the city of art - attracts many tourists to find the ways of learning its artistic resources and to derive a great inspiration. Furthermore, the artists prove remarkable ability to articulate genuineness about historical and cultural heritage which can develop a high sense of self-identity. By the reason for this, domestic and national art viewers may derive a core meaning of authentic art forms, in which this noticeably prevents many ethnics and tribes to die out in a country.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the authorities expectedly fund artistic talents to promote cultural heritage of a nation and strengthen an individual's nationality. This is as long as the private sectors keep supporting the talented ones by establishing good framework.
- In many countries people like to eat more food from other regions than can be grown in a local area As a result much of the food has to come from other regions Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 89
- People now days send text massages more frequently than they talk the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Many companies sponsor sports to advertise their products or service What advantages and disadvantages does this bring for the teams and individuals that these companies sponsor 90
- There is more and more outrage and anger common in society today Why is this Is this a positive or a negative development 65
- Success is often measured by wealth and material belongings in modern times Do you think wealth is the best measure of success What in your opinion makes a person successful in life 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... heritage of a nation and strengthen an individuals nationality. This is as long as the pri...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, may, regarding, so, then, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38666666667 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9904603966 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1519219708 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236984346655 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746705888229 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083613494476 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134693238043 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600486572817 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.