Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own
At the present time, some citizens believe that the government should support the works of painters and musicians, others argue that this should be headed on other organisations. This essay will examine both of these viewpoints which will deliberated below.
On the one hand, opponents of government fund on arts argue that the authority should priorly handle another crucial issue (healthcare) which the national budget is allocated to. Regarding such issue, musicians are supposed to be independent to earn revenue source from joining and music festivals. In addition, many artists are advisably funded by private companies which support any local art communities. Take Habitat for Humanity as an example, a non-profit organization, provides the artworks to stimulate the respect of human rights. Hence, those allow people to reflect more to social humanism.
On the other hand, proponents of this view opine that professional artists highly introduce various cultural artworks of a country. For example, Paris - famous with the city of art - attracts many tourists to learn its ways of artistic resources and to derive a great inspiration. Furthermore, such artists prove a remarkable ability to articulate genuinely historical heritage which can develop a high sense of self-identity in a region. Accordingly, those of national and international viewers may derive an authentic meaning of art forms, in which this noticeably prevents many ethnics and tribes to die out.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the authorities expectedly fund artistic talents to globally promote cultural preservation and strengthen ones' nationality. This is as long as the private sectors keep supporting the talented ones by establishing good framework.
- Recent research has shown that business meetings and training are increasingly taking place online What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 89
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 84
- With the recent development in technology like e books some people feel that the printed media like books newspapers and magazine will soon be a thing of the past Others feel that those forms of media will never disappear Discuss both of the views and giv 95
- Friendships that take place online are not as meaningful as those where people meet each other face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to earn revenue source from joining and music festivals. In addition, many artis...
^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...te cultural preservation and strengthen ones nationality. This is as long as the pri...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, furthermore, hence, may, regarding, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55639097744 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99300253205 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654135338346 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.808497884 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.692307692 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240669234854 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073254049199 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700828522025 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135359132871 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606149642574 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to earn revenue source from joining and music festivals. In addition, many artis...
^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...te cultural preservation and strengthen ones nationality. This is as long as the pri...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, furthermore, hence, may, regarding, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55639097744 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99300253205 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654135338346 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.808497884 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.692307692 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240669234854 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073254049199 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700828522025 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135359132871 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606149642574 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.