Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

It is the case that the race for hosting global sporting events is intensely competitive. Yet some argue that hosting such events is problematic. Others and I opine that their arguments are not plausible, ignoring the far-reaching benefits of organizing such sports events.
On the one hand, it is believed that international sporting events would induce some serious problems in the host country. One of the evident problems is that the government needs to build new or renovate existing sports facilities, which means that they have to spend a huge sum of money on such investments. Consequently, other vital sectors like public health or education may suffer from a shortage of income for their development. Another issue is that when the tournament is being held, tourists from all over the world would flock to the host country. This massive movement might threaten national security, as some terrorists or criminals might come to the country for illegal purposes.
On the other hand, I deem that holding world-class sports tournaments such as Olympics or FIFA World cups would bring a great number of merits to the host country. In the first place, hosting such tournaments can build the reputation and dignity of the host country all over the world. Admittedly, increasing the profile of a city/nation can lead to lasting economic benefits. For example, cities that host the Olympics can be assured of a persistent increase in recognition and tourism. Further, another significant merit is the long-term investment that comes from preparing for a major event. The city/country will have a legacy of improved sporting venues. They have to invest in infrastructure and transport to cater to an influx of tourists and these facilities can use in the long run.
In short, although holding an international sporting event would have some drawbacks, I would contend that the benefits in terms of the country’s reputation and strategic investment are long-lasting and sustainable.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-18 Thai Tran 78 view
2023-09-26 nle.hngoc 56 view
2023-07-11 llrasthy J 84 view
2023-07-07 Kiwi 56 view
2023-02-14 Kiwi 73 view
Essays by user quangnguyeenx :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, so, for example, in short, such as, in the first place, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23197492163 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91593010244 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542319749216 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8536384788 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205557392746 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753669963006 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592258892777 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144038642516 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247082041345 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.