Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In this day and age, the protection of wild animals hase earned great attention from people with astronomical amount of time and money allocated to it. However, other people contend that that financial budget should have catered the needy world. From my point of view, although this opinion is justifiable, I believe that the investment in the wildlife conservation is fundamental.
Admittedly, there are several reasons why money and time should be spent on fostering the world, chief of which is that human can live a more decent life. It cannot be denied that numerous people are suffering from poverty, war and the like all over the planet. Only after being subsidised with financial aids and the attention of the government can those hazards be tackled. For example, if the United Nations had not allocated 5 billion dollars to the African countries, over a million of children would have died out of hunger. As a result, there are a multitude of problems in today’s needy world that deserve better care and assistance from the governments.
However, I advocate that the protection of wildlife animals is indispensable, even if it costs ample money and time. The first thing to notice is that if endangered animals are left dying, the biodiversity will soon deteriorate. This might lead to the imbalance of the nature, accordingly the world may go into doomsday. Furthermore, wild animals are valuable resources for numerous life-saving drugs. Take the chimpanzees as an example, scientists have recently created vaccines for covid 19 thanks to the resemblance between human body and chimpanzees’ body functions. Without any doubt, the investment on wildlife protection is, in other words, the funding for the thrive of humans’ life.
In conclusion, although it is undeniable that financial support and attention of government should serve the human population, I am convinced that the conservation of wild animals is also worth paying for as it assures the natural diversity in tandem with be conducive to the betterment of people lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-03 | abid1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | mynguyen001 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
- The bar chart shows mobile usage in a country by age group from 1998 to 2000 84
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 73
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work Some people regard this as completely wrong while others consider it as valuable work experience important for learning and taking responsibility What are your opinions on this 73
- The information below give details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 78
- Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ems in today’s needy world that deserve better care and assistance from the government...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 665, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ion is, in other words, the funding for the thrive of humans’ life. In conclusion, alt...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20180722892 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87169849945 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563253012048 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.370376245 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.133333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267145713549 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789521061817 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716903607708 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156345561755 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438358107536 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.