The use of mobile phones has increases dramatically in recent years. What are the positive and negative effects of this?
In today's modern world, the proliferation of different technological gadgets has made great impacts on people’s lives, especially the use of mobile phones. From my point of view, I believe there are both pros and cons of this ubiquitous use of phones.
On the one hand, there are several benefits of having personal phones. One thing worth considering is that it can act as an official assistance in people's daily lives. As there are a multitude of different apps and services including Google Maps, Timer and the like, users can utilize the phones for work, school or entertainment. As a result, their workload and daily activities can be fostered to create apparently high productivity just by a small hand held device. Moreover, mobile phones not only assist with work and recreational use but also facilitate communication between people. When friends or family members reside far from each other, they remain contacted through a myriad of social media such as Facebook, Instagram, to name but a few. Thus, the relationships can prolong and people can find help whenever they are in distress immediately with a click on the phone.
On the other, I believe no matter how beneficial the phone can be, the drawbacks it causes cannot be discarded. It is obvious that the ubiquitous and long-time use of phones makes people more prone to several health problems. If someone has glued their eyes to the phone screens too much, he can suffer from short-sighted eyes, not to mention backache, headache or many other lethal ailments associated with the radiation from the phones. Furthermore, mobile phones can be the reason for the expressly high level of procrastination among people. It is apparent that people always feel tempted to check on their phones with the bell or else they can feel agitated. If this situation gets rampant, people will soon procrastinate their work to check the message and emails, then the quality and productivity of their study or work can, to some extent, be jeopardized.
In conclusion, as the phones have become entwined in people’s lives, it can bring numerous advantages including the bridge between relationships, the call for emergency and the use as a multifunctional device. I am, however, convinced that there are more glaring negative influences of this such as the detrimental impacts to health and turning people into procrastinators.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11538461538 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91217151491 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7217752042 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.352941176 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136087983212 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488559282861 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383627852246 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958511685929 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185332821493 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.