Some people think that intelligence is innate while others think that we can improve our intelligence through learning. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
While it is argued by some individuals that intelligence is embedded and a pre-existing features of a person, there are others who have different thoughts about it and they believe it can be increased gradually through learning. There are valid opinions on both sides, which I will consider now.
On the one hand, individuals supporting intelligence as pre-existing quality claims that it is often seen that people who become scientists and researchers later on in their life, have shown intelligence since inception. Moreover, it can be seen that some people gains more achievements than others, even though they put in less hard work. Furthermore, it is also evident that different children have different IQ level and that is one key factor which enormously influence public opinion on intelligence being part of one person since birth.
On the other hand, people argue that intelligence can be increased over time by proper learning. For example, it can be seen that some children do not perform well at their school time but ends up getting admit at reputed colleges later. Furthermore public supporting this side claims that gifted intelligence mostly help a person reach to mediocre level, but to reach a pinnacle or beyond boundaries one needs to work hard and put in extra efforts. In addition to that, it is irrefutable that if intelligent person will not get adequate guidance, chances of his/her failure might be high.
To sum up, my own feeling is even though individuals posses little intelligence since his/her birth, as sometimes it depends on genes, but in most of the case one needs to work really hard to get fruitful results out of that brilliant gift which is provided to them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-02 | abhinav.ap7 | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-29 | debsana | 78 | view |
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people say that increasing the price of fattening foods will solve this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this sets a bad example to young people.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 60
- Some people think that intelligence is innate while others think that we can improve our intelligence through learning. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'feature'?
Suggestion: feature
...lligence is embedded and a pre-existing features of a person, there are others who have ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 239, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...etting admit at reputed colleges later. Furthermore public supporting this side claims that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, really, so, well, while, for example, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06713780919 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77926819163 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575971731449 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1469226913 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.4 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211965661393 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936341456098 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599982771678 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136499509371 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660650755483 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.