Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams (for example, football). Other people think that taking part in individual sports such as swimming is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Team-played sports such as, football and basketball, are considered more beneficial. Conversely, some people assume that single-played sport such as, swimming and running, have more advantageous. This essay will elaborate each side and provides a conclusion at the end.
To begin with, those who support this concept admit that people participating in grub sports have better teamwork in work place inasmuch as they are used to playing in team. It seems that they know their function as team, and it would be applied in their work life. Systematically, individuals would possibly support each other and try to maximize companies’ income based on their position, since there are many specific positions in grub sport. For instance, in football, position such as, striker, beck, and goal keeper own specific function, but they have same purpose, for winning a game. Moreover, it can be potentially said that team-played sport could corroborate individual’s friendship as they regularly spend time together. By this, it means that people will know each other better, due to being in one team and having to work cooperatively.
Looking into opposite opinion, it can be seen that individual-played sports focus in one organ system’s health, and it brings benefit since individuals have different needs for their own health. For instance, those who have cardio problem can do running, and those who have respiratory problem can do swimming. Furthermore, it can be obviously said that, different people own different choice for doing sport, so that it would be unethical to force people to do sport which they are not keen on it. Secondly, there are some people who are introvert, meaning that they prefer something alone. If they wanted to stay healthy, they could do individual-played sports.
To sum up, it could be possibly admitted that single-played sports posses some benefit, from focusing specific organ system to being best choice for introvert. However, I assume that besides being healthy, principals in team-played sport can be applied in work life as long as people who participate in sport have same interest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-18 | MEBC Class | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Fila | 61 | view |
- Most countries want to improve standard of living through economic development however others think social value is lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Scientists predict that in the future cars will be driven by computers What are reasons behind this Is it positive or negative development 73
- The pie charts below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first chart shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second chart shows the activities in which the girls participate 67
- The table below shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 78
- Some people think that when recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in team and follow instructions Discuss both views and 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'being the best'.
Suggestion: being the best
... from focusing specific organ system to being best choice for introvert. However, I assume...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 319, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'interested'.
Suggestion: interested
...ople who participate in sport have same interest.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27433628319 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91910226147 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533923303835 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3112707835 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260284786057 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103914091519 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663505472002 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184068590688 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344877486602 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.