Nowadays, there is a heated discussion about whether the student in groups with peers or let them study alone. Some feel that study alone is coming with more beneficial. However I believe students should be learning in a group to understand how the ability they will acquire getting along with each person for future career path.
Firstly, the young who studying alone in their own space such as at home or facing to the individual tutor wold make the learning process more efficient. Teachers and elders play the responsible roles in giving instructions and feedback immediately so that the young could clear and correct the mistake achieving the learning steps. Most young still in coal formative years always being effected by their peers, sometimes, causing the distraction. Study individual makes the learning process more efficient.
On the one hand, some people argued that pupil could achieve more advantages in learning in groups. While learning something new with peers can improve their communication skills by discussing idea, sharing their thoughts and exchanging opinions with their classmates. In this way, Students can gain the ability to tolerate and acceptance of the whom are not similar with them. It helps them to built a team spirit. Even more, in their experience would encouraged theirselves to take more challenging as cooperate with the others to complete the goal.
In sum, both of these to opinion are reasonable. Individual study is a efficient way to gain the knowledge and focus on the major subject area. But I sure that the students learning in a group can foster the team spirit and gain the ability to adapt in the social community.
- Some people believe that students should take a wide range of courses. However, others believe that students would focus on the subject that they are good at or they are interested in. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups, while others believe that it is better for them to study alone.Discuss both views and give your opinions. 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend colleges or universities? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...y alone is coming with more beneficial. However I believe students should be learning i...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the learning process more efficient. On the one hand, some people argued that...
^^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'encourage'
Suggestion: encourage
...t. Even more, in their experience would encouraged theirselves to take more challenging as...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ion are reasonable. Individual study is a efficient way to gain the knowledge and...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, so, still, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11636363636 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59662845606 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610909090909 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3112764377 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242599625752 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788615013102 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502405001207 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13417700802 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601864079077 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.