Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries, shop and on public transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There is an increasingly growing popular idea that such technological devices as mobile phones ought to be prohibited in public locations. I, however, firmly believe that it is not worth applying this regulation in practical and this essay will tackle the most important reasons why.
This is primarily due to the fact that without the appearance of phones, some activities seem to be too complicated to accomplish. We can not deny that in public places, people have tendency to complete their work by handy and portable devices like phones, which can connect with the internet to access information swiftly. To shed light on this issue, only after the cutting-edge technological achievements such as smart phone appear do people consider it to be a supporter, helping them with their knowledge acquisition and frequently use it in the libraries, especially in the universities.
Futhermore, it is noted that in the era of modernization, mobile phones are the most prevalent device to interact. To be more specific, not only are the human interactions needed, but also in some emergency situations, phones can meet the requirements of people quickly. For instance, in public area, hardly do managers require attendees not to bring their smart phones as if someone tends to inform an alarming issue, they can use their devices.
Granted, there is no denying that smart phones, sometimes are irritated and annoyed, especially when the owners coincidentally make them ring in public area. However, it is not a serious problem, which can be coped with by silent mode.
In conclusion, it is highly recommended that mobile phones should not be left out of people’s sight as their significant benefits in emergency situations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-22 | mminhhchau | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-18 | PRM12 | 68 | view |
- he graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shop and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct E g Dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- Reading is an important activity to you You answer the question in the form of an essay of approximately 250 words 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, incidentally, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25899280576 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97532248071 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58273381295 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.2892451318 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.909090909 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255952642329 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940277352459 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325477132954 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139016519455 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321994968853 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.