Populations of countries of the European Union in 1998 and 2007 by percentage.
A glance at the pie chart reveals the population distribution of various regions of the European Union in a 9-year period, starting from 1998 by portions.
In generall, over 9 years, although it experienced such minimal changes in the graphs, Germany was still considered as a lion’s share.
As can be seen from the pie charts, in 6 different countries, over the period of 9 years, inspite of recording 17,1% in the first year, experiencing a steady fall by 0,5% in the following period, Germany was still considered as the biggest slice in the graph.
In contrast, respectively accounting for 8% and 8.3%, Poland and Spain made up the least proportions, no matter how slight Poland dropped by 0,3% and marginal the others grew to 9%. Besides, it witnessed a gradual rise in Italy and The United Kingdom by an inconsiderable 0,1%, beginning at 11,8% and 12,2% respectively. Meanwhile, having occupied just over a tenth of the chart (12,5%), marginally did France go up over nearly a decade.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
- he graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct E g Dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shop and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Populations of countries of the European Union in 1998 and 2007 by percentage 81
- The percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in 4 countries in 1970 and 2000 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, still, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96428571429 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89870563029 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660714285714 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2111098036 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0725524408294 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388413862745 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868519800501 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582620794118 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100912881696 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.