Some people think that money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the advanced optimization of the modern world, there has been a controversy regarding how national budgets should be allocated. While it is somewhat justifiable to invest in technological equipment for space discovery, I strongly believe that spendings on other realms are much more worthwhile.
Many advocate that pecuniary expenditure on facilities for exploing space is conducive to finding another sphere as an alternative to the deteriorated environment people have to live on earth. They would have better chances to survive and sustain in an untouched and unpolluted planet in the long term. However, the idea is flawed as it fails to take into account the very fact that ensuring human life in another planet is not an easy task. Such process entails a large sum of money to be invested and people have yet to identify any livable places outside the earth even with the most state-of-the-art technology. Moreover, obstacles that prevent people from having a sustainable life on earth are mainly associated with environmental issues. As a result, such approaches as protecting the eco-system are ultimate while making efforts to ensure long-term existence of the humanity in a new natural habitat seems to be time-consuming.
I am convinced that prioritizing the development of various fields should be taken into sober consideration. From an objective perspective, it is the governmental stance to harness the value of education and medication worldwide. In fact, millions of people across the globe are living in dire straits and do not have privileges to enjoy a fortunate life as others. Undernourished children in Africa are a significant case in point. Their lives are plagued by extreme starvation and many of them could not gain access to proper schooling or medical treatment. In this case, rather than trying to boost space exploration, the government should expend money on philanthropic activities including charity and fundraising to emancipate these children from the shackles of poverty. Not only could various social ills in poverty-stricken areas be substantially combated but this would also lay a solid foundation for a nation to thrive.
In conclusion, despite the enormous benefits of monetary distribution on space discovery, I think that paying attention to accommodating human living demands is of paramount importance based on aforementioned arguments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-06 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Vivi_peach | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to natural areas such as South Pole Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe that they should be free to do what they want Discuss both view and give your own opinions 89
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advocate seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many advocates'.
Suggestion: Many advocates
...her realms are much more worthwhile. Many advocate that pecuniary expenditure on facilitie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ernative to the deteriorated environment people have to live on earth. They would...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2026.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43163538874 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2066786425 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624664879357 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6701671991 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.625 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3125 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143518977902 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384123352401 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461183583723 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813282053024 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291310844462 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.