Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people.Do you agree or disagree?

Rich is the term used to describe a person who has a lot of money. I partially agree with that because, being rich doesn't represents not only money but also way of utilization of it. This means people need to treat common people not by their wealth but with their kindliness.

To probe further, in olden days it can be seen that there is a lot of discrimination among people because of their assets and prosperity, However the person with properties are considered as rich and well respective whereas people not having money are treated as workers under rich families. For instance, in olden movies like " Pedarayudu", the great actor padmasri Mohan Babu performed a main role which narrates about poor people working under him. He treats all members in equivalent manner inspite of his power and richness. Thus, I agree that most significant aspect regarding moneyed is to select path of usage in a right way which will be in accordance to public.

On the other hand, it is crystalline that in these contemporary era, people are more concerned of their individual fame along with their family reputation. They are not bothered about others who are not connected with them. Public are not in a state to appertain to needy rather than they became self-centered to give a hand. Now-a-days we can see that luxuriance is consumed only to improve their wealth more better but not to have a worthy of it.

In nutshell, kindliness and fame can be obtained only if lavishness is put on the right track rather than used for getting more power, nevertheless it only diminishes the future.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...lly agree with that because, being rich doesnt represents not only money but also way ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir wealth but with their kindliness. To probe further, in olden days ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ding moneyed is to select path of usage in a right way which will be in accordance to public. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which will be in accordance to public. On the other hand, it is crystalline...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are not in a state to appertain to needy rather than they became self-centered to...
^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...s consumed only to improve their wealth more better but not to have a worthy of it. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tter but not to have a worthy of it. In nutshell, kindliness and fame can be ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86861313869 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70962236961 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594890510949 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4595250285 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.166666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17131677653 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610536697286 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399226374037 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096396419352 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498495789717 0.056905535591 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.