Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.
People have different views whether parents are responsible to educate children how to behave and to treat people in the community or schools should take full responsibility on this aspect. This essay will address both of the arguments and provide an opinion as a conclusion.
Parents share responsibilities regarding nurturing their children about how to behave in society. This is mainly because of many aspects in children's lives such as their attitude and the ways they interact with others are imitating their parents’ behavior. The way the children approach new people, for instance, is almost similar to the way their parents interact with strangers. This attitude has been observed by children since they were children, and when they are in a similar situation, they unconsciously treat the new people in the same way that their parents do. For this reason, the aspect of nurturing children how to treat people in the community has to be paid attention by parents.
However, this does not mean that schools are less responsible for this account. In many schools in Indonesia, attitude is one compulsory subject that all children must enroll in. This indicates that schools also play a significant role in terms of teaching children about how to be a good member of society. Moreover, children spend 8 hours a day in school. Thus, schools have adequate time to educate the pupils about how to behave and treat people in the community.
To sum up, there is a debate about who is responsible to educate children to be a good member of society. However, I personally believe that both parents and school share similar responsibilities because children tend to imitate their parents and the amount of time that children spend in school.
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 73
- The map below shows university sports courts in 1990 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 84
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 84
- The table gives information about department and online stores in Australia in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, as to, for instance, such as, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75210739939 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474048442907 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5980860929 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.428571429 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352015160632 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13632611352 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679877428178 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233982739081 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377971007217 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.