Some people think that robots are very important for humans' future development. Others, however, think that robots are a dangerous invention that could have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Artificial intelligence is the top concern in many countries across the globe. Whether robots bring more harm than good to the society is a debatable issue. I, personally, believe their drawbacks are, by far, more significant.
A great deal of benefits from robotic systems has been proven in many ways. Firstly, robots are created to be able to perform tasks in 24 hours consecutively in factories and families without salary. In fact, a household robot can fulfil the chores such as cleaning the house, making the bed or even acting as a babysitter, which are widely enjoyed in the contemporary society. Therefore, they are undoubtedly of great help in saving time and money. Another striking feature is that this technological innovation can replace human in such extreme conditions. This case is true in destroying a bomb, for example, in which robots can protect many labors from being exposed to hazardous and poisonous environments, constituting likelihoods of reducing labor-related risks.
Nonetheless, despite these arguments, I would claim that robot’s downsides could not be underestimated. As the economy is increasing dependence on autonomy, and robots are expected to carry out various tasks, which puts a large number of workers in the brink of joblessness. One shortcoming worth mentioning is that the artificial intelligence of robots can never replace human brains in addressing numerous problems. In terms of health care, few robots are capable of carrying out operations on human, which requires experiences and skillfulness. And if any mistakes happen, robots are less likely to bear responsibilities.
In conclusion, I reaffirm my view that while its endeavors are hardly arguable, robots are threatening our lives to some extents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-20 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-29 | Soroush99 | 73 | view |
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations. 73
- These days, it seems that an increasing number of people are leaving rural areas to live in thecity.Discuss some of the effects of rural depopulation (migration from the country to the city ) andsuggest some ways on which this trend could be reversed. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ern in many countries across the globe. Whether robots bring more harm than good to the...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 771, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ihoods of reducing labor-related risks. Nonetheless, despite these arguments, I ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... to carry out various tasks, which puts a large number of workers in the brink of joblessness. On...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41818181818 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14461575784 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672727272727 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5391845505 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167898854056 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512567756574 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030637310455 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932249602473 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367646277992 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.