Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities, while others think it is better to have students of different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the education field, people have different views about which type of class organization is appropriate for students' development. Particularly, it is argued whether we should apply streaming student practice or group students with diverse abilities in a class. While streaming in school is sometimes beneficial, I believe that mix-ability class organizations should be encouraged.
On the one hand, classifying students through academic abilities is favored because students can have their skills sharpened. With more specialized materials and syllabuses, pupils have a chance to broaden their knowledge in certain fields, and therefore pursue higher achievement in those fields. By dint of that advantage, some high schools in Vietnam, for example, classify students according to their advantageous subjects such as Math and English, intending to foster students’ abilities. With the same level of absorbing knowledge, the streaming practice also helps facilitate the teaching process and reduce the pressure for teachers when delivering lessons. However, this type of class may put pupils under stress when they have to emphasize academic achievement and possibly suffer from peer pressure.
On the other hand, when studying in a mixed-ability class, students would learn to cooperate with others of different levels. This is possibly an opportunity for pupils with lower academic levels to get support from their peers, creating a sense of motivation for those pupils to study more efficiently. Additionally, a sense of cooperation irrespective of levels or abilities could help avoid discrimination within a class, and this attitude is also a vital factor when it comes to working in a company. Although teachers may have to tailor teaching strategies which is understandable for all kinds of students, students could access various skills such as artistic skill and musical skill besides academic skills. Thus, students would not only develop academic skills but their talents as well.
In conclusion, while streaming in school is advantageous, it seems to me that grouping pupils regardless of their abilities is a much more favorable option.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the education field, people have diff...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6472392638 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9951659147 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58282208589 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6284683238 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274993896968 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106839926084 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727837076904 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177815199604 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483951832488 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.