Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
It is true that the question of whether to classify students according to their talents or to allow students with different abilities to study with each other remains a source of controversy in the education field. While a number of people believe that classifying students is a better choice, I would argue that a class with different types of students is significantly superior.
On the one hand, selecting students based on their academic abilities is beneficial in some ways. Firstly, the class will have less disruption as the study environment will revolve around their specific abilities and they are at the same academic level. In addition, the progress of students will be much faster than in a standard class since selected students have distinct talents and academic abilities that help them accumulate knowledge easily.
On the other hand, I believe that a class with a variety of students with different skills is a better choice. First, students are surrounded by many people with various abilities, which helps them to overcome difficulties in other fields or subjects by asking them for help. In addition, this type of study environment will create more all-round students rather than limited students who have mastered only a specific skill, thus increasing the chances of getting a well-paid job. For example, a student who does well in every subject/field is more likely to get a job than a student who only does well in one or two specific abilities.
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that it is better to have different students with various abilities study together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | thaonguyendeptraihetcuu | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | minhhuy1000 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | hi.nguyn91 | 84 | view |
- It is true that some students who finish high school opt to work or travel for a period before they start university While I accept that there are benefits and drawbacks of this decision in terms of their studies I would argue that it is better to take a 73
- The graph shows changes in the prices per kilogram of various types of bread in Europe between 2001 and 2005 67
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think this has more advantages or disadvantages FOR THEIR STUDIES 70
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 61
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think this has more advantages or disadvantages FOR THEIR STUDIES 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
It is true that the question of whether to classify students according to their...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 639, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... well in one or two specific abilities. In conclusion, although both views certa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12267657993 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7495575802 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513011152416 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.6119362012 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.8 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436879123469 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200682368397 0.084324248473 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903782243438 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296394203142 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665752783944 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.