Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
Many countries in the world opt for the education method of grouping students based on their academic achievements. While some others may argue that it would be nice if students of all academic level could be given the chance to pursuit education together regardless of their abilities, I believe that selecting students that share the same standard of ability into schools has more visible benefits.
On the one hand, it cannot be denied that given all students opportunity to study at the same center would be appreciably more simple for parents as well as the local government in selecting schools for the off-springs. When there is no distinction, the parents can choose any school they fancy without worrying about whether this school is suitable in term of academic level for their kids or not. Also, the local government can assign children into schools in the local area, which is significantly easier to manage and mitigate the risk of commuting to schools being far from their houses.
On the other hand, grouping students into various academic center helps sharpen their own skills. Children has different cognitive abilities as well as different knacks for learning various subjects, therefore they need different way of educating to truly shine at their own fields. Cristiano Ronaldo had not become one of the most talented and admired football players in the world if he had not spent time since the young age to practice with the ball, even though his teacher once told him that he could not become rich with the ball and should focus on studying instead.
In conclusion, though it is easier for parents and governments when children can study anywhere irrespective of their abilities, I consider that categorizing them actually help students develop and become excellent in their own aspect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | thaonguyendeptraihetcuu | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | minhhuy1000 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | hi.nguyn91 | 84 | view |
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 84
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 89
- In some countries young people are not only richer but also safer and healthier than ever before However they are often less happy What do you think are the reasons for this and what can be done to help 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 556, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'school'.
Suggestion: school
...e and mitigate the risk of commuting to schools being far from their houses. On the ot...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08389261745 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57506773309 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560402684564 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.843917961 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.333333333 106.682146367 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1111111111 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7777777778 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282418259778 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119298309675 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659495680711 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172703571248 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684314623069 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.