Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
Some people advocate the idea that school’s classes should be categorized according to pupil’s academic performance while others hold the belief that constructing mix-ability classroom would be a superior approach. From my personal perspective, despite the fact that both opinion have their own merits and demerits, I would content with the former.
On the one hand, students in a mixed-level class would have the opportunity to be in close interaction with those at other levels. Hence, they would not only have the opportunity to acknowledge their own weekness and strength but also be able to receive support from counterparts. To cite an example, a students who is excelling at Math but struggling with Literature, can ask for assistance from those that are good at Literature. Besides, there is an existed downside that should be taken into consideration. Should some students fall behind with their classmates because of the disparity in academic level, it may create a lot of obstacles not only for the students themselves but the teachers as well.
On the other hand, by sorting out student on the basis of their academic performances, both students and teachers can reap a variety of benefits from this teaching method. First and foremost, it is easier for teacher to monitor and keep track of their pupils thank to little performance discrepancy. Secondly, as the lecture is well-designed to target only one specific level, students can effortlessly get hold of the lesson content. To be more specific, the intelligent group would be provided with advanced materials and faster tutorial speed while students with lower academic ability can be carefully catered by teachers with simpler lesson plans.
In a nutshell, notwithstanding the merits of both types of classroom, I would take side with the ideas of constructing specific classroom in accordance with students’ levels due to the aforementioned advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | thaonguyendeptraihetcuu | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | minhhuy1000 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | hi.nguyn91 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers Some disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Young people are now spending more and more time and money following fashion trends What is your opinion Is this a positive or negative development 78
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
... from counterparts. To cite an example, a students who is excelling at Math but struggling...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01928951722 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562091503268 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.8678476479 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302350482588 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111263692731 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617808181879 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192050292938 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514134141355 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.