Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not effective. Education and job training should be used instead. Do you agree or disagree?
Whether imprisonment can help to combat the rising crime crates remains a highly controversial issue. Some people claim that rehabilitation is a better way to fight against crime because they can help to change offenders’ behaviour and beliefs. However, sending criminals to jail is more effective because it is the right form of punishment and can reinforce individual’s reponsibility.
Firstly, it is obvious that prisons can serve all purposes well, including prevention, deterrence and retribution. As those who commit crimes are imprisoned, they will be prevented from posing threats to society. In addition, the complete loss of liberty in a prison can act as a deterrent, discouring others from getting involved in crime. Moreover, incarceration can help society gain retribution from offenders. Obviously, imprisonment is an effective method to reduce crime.
Secondly, there is no doubt that sending criminals to prison can ensure that those who commit offences take responsibilities for what they have done. If criminals are not put on jail, they will get away with their actions. Unless harsh penalties are imposed, criminals will be absolved of their responsiblities, eroding the moral fabric of the society.
Those who oppose incarceration base their argument on the fact that sending criminals to jail is justing merely dealing with the symptoms rather than addressing the root causes. Although this is true to some extent, rehabilitation, which includes education and job training, is just a soft option. Without heavy punishments, criminals will continue to offend with virtual impunity. Therefore, it is generally agreed that the imposition of imprisonment is the most practical way to solve the problem of crime.
To conclude, although many people believe that education and training should replace imprisonment, imprisonment is indeed the best option. Sending criminals to jail is not only the right form of punishment but can also ensure individual’s responsiblities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-01 | nle.hngoc | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | llrasthy J | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | kencchan | 52 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-26 | nganphuong05 | 84 | view |
- Write a paragraph about the typical characteristics of Vietnamese people 56
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 73
- With the considerable benefits computers and the Internet brings about they can completely replace the traditional roles of teachers Do you agree or disagree 78
- Ways to promote creativity at school 89
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether imprisonment can help to combat the ris...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in addition, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58552631579 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18474739928 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588815789474 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1788211446 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8823529412 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192592879749 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057098131277 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369905327681 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107856494253 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346629041347 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.