Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on important subjects.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
A few people feel that food science should be added to school curriculum whereas others opine that preference should be given to learning other important subjects such as maths and science. In my opinion, it is crucial for children to understand) the benefits of food and learn cooking in school as knowledge about food will help them remain / stay healthy throughout their life and also cooking is a basic skill which everyone should learn from their early days.
As children easily get influenced by their teachers it would be a good idea to make them learn the importance of right food in school. This is because nowadays social media and television are full of advertisements related to unhealthy food options. So, if a child is aware of food science and how nutritious food would keep their body fit, that would encourage them to choosr correct food habits. In addition, cooking is a necessity and should be taught to everyone. The curriculum should have a subject such as home science where students can be taught how to prepare their own food. It would motivate them to indulge themselves in home cooked food instead of spending money on junk food available in markets.
Others who think school days should be used for learning important subjects such as maths and science would argue that these subjects help students in making successful careers later in life. Moreover, in their view, teaching students to learn cooking would distract them from the main subjects. This might lead to students performing poorly in important career-making subjects. However, in today’s time when childhood obesity is being very common, incorporating food science as a subject in school curriculum might help in curbing this issue. Also, there should be just one or two hours a week for learning to cook. This way, it will have no impact on children’s focus on core subjects.
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar charts show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia Darwin 1 Sydney 2 Melbourne 3 Brisbane 4 Perth 5 and Canberra 6 in October 2009 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva
- Online communication is becoming more popular than face to face communication Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The graph gives information about the number of people in Australia who used Chinese Arabic Italian or Greek as their first mother tongue Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cook'.
Suggestion: to cook
...derstand the benefits of food and learn cooking in school as knowledge about food will ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 464, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...one should learn from their early days. As children easily get influenced by their...
^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cook'.
Suggestion: to cook
... their view, teaching students to learn cooking would distract them from the main subje...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98083067093 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55268038087 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546325878594 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3051368615 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.357142857 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286672812485 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10427214985 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774097201667 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202860887447 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152131206113 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.