Some people think that technology makes life complex, so we should make our life simpler without using technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
Technological advances has tremendously benefit people nowadays. Despite the merits, some believe that it increases the complexity for human’s lives. I partly agree with this point of view as the role of technology is irreplaceable for the time being.
Digital disturbance and constant access to others are of great concern to many people. With the advent of internet and smart technological devices, humans are constantly bothered with spam messages, emails, advertisements, and so forth. These are primary sources of disturbance in today’s world. This could cause degradation of people’s attention, which is one of the main culprit of low academic achievement, or poor performance in the workplace. Besides, internet connection grants workers constant access to their seniors, which would act as a catalyst for stress and anxiety for employees after working hours. That is why some people think that technological advances may not be beneficial but bring complexity to our lives.
However. This viewpoint is flawed as the benefits of technology could overshadow its disadvantages. This is stemmed from the fact that the majority of society is benefited from the evolution of technology. The fist point of view is that it relieves workers off conventional burden of paperwork, thereby reducing their workload. As a result, staff have more time for their family and themselves which provides them with a sense job satisfaction. From businesses’ perspective, deployment of state-of-the-art equipment boosts the productivity and efficiency. Because of this, more output are manufactured which in turn increases the wealth of society and nations. More importantly, technology has reshaped the nature of our society in which individuals are enabled to making purchases or transactions online. Thus, given the advent of technological boom times, people are now able to let their fingers do the walking.
In sum, even though there are pitfalls associated with harnessing new creation of technology, people yet depend on it for their work and daily lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-03 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | Vũ Ngọc Lam | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | Vũ Ngọc Lam | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | Vũ Ngọc Lam | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-06 | vothithungandhqn@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos while others think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important Discuss both views 78
- Some people say that the main aim of advertising is to improve the sales of products that people do not really need To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that staying in hotels is not a good option to know about a country or its people What do you think about this viewpoint 89
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 61
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'benefited', 'benefitted'.
Suggestion: benefited; benefitted
...Technological advances has tremendously benefit people nowadays. Despite the merits, so...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ial but bring complexity to our lives. However. This viewpoint is flawed as the benefi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, may, so, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51898734177 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13261729856 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601265822785 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2881069698 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.8888888889 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72222222222 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166496496712 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530766629815 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641745660368 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980676776771 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482148748846 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.