Some people think they have the right to use as much freshwater as they want. Others believe governments should tightly control the use of fresh water as it is a limited resource. Discuss both views and give your option.
Non-saline water usage is now being debated by many people, some believe that governments should reinforce limitations pertaining to this since it is a finite source. But others disagree while believing they have the right to leverage it. This essay will explore two different points of view regarding this topic before stating a stance concerning it.
For starters, supporters of unlimited water usage debated that water is a basic need as it is being used every day for drinking and bathing. The quantity of water usage in a family could differ depending on the needs of each family member and situation. For instance, a large family that lives within the hot region might consume more than 30 liters of potable water per month for bathing and drinking because if they were to consume less water than that, they might experience dehydration. Therefore, limiting water consumption might be seen as inhumane. In addition, most people pay for their water consumption thus giving them the rights to utilize it according to their needs.
On the contrary, proponents of limited water usage emphasize that sustainability factors should be prioritized. While it is true that clean water is a basic human need, it doesn’t mean that resource exploitation should be allowed. It is because if clean water were to be exploited, it could lead to scarcity. This is why the government should take preventive action by managing the fresh waters. By letting the government regulate it, basic needs of water could be met while tertiary usage could be reduced. For example, the government could supply more water for the essential needs such as irrigation, drinking water and bathing while cutting down supply for extravagant purposes such as private pools and jacuzzis.
To sum up, in my opinion both of the arguments are valid but limiting clean water usage would be wiser to prevent the possibility of water shortage. This is as long as the government could do a proper job to fulfill societal needs for clean water.
- Some people think they have the right to use as much freshwater as they want Others believe governments should tightly control the use of fresh water as it is a limited resource Discuss both views and give your option 73
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed However other people think that zoos are useful to protect the rare animals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 53
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, in my opinion, it is true, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05105105105 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62865531169 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9244879531 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.125 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211212303474 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789048627234 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481382617386 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134137826978 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035454190952 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.