Some people think that we should divide students based on their academic ability, while others think we should educate all students together. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There has been a colossal upsurge in discussing whether the school should or shouldn't divide students based on their academic ability. Although there are some stupendous achievement from mixed class, it still has its negative effect. Both of pedagogic method have pros and cons which will be analysed in the following essay before my rational conclusion is reached.
Firstly, distinguishing students based on their academic skill can help the teacher save time and effort in one lesson. It is undeniable that the class having same level student can create a chance for teacher to keep up with their accessing ability and easily convey the meaning level in one lesson. Secondly, the school can release the different level curiculum due to its separation. Thirdly, students in the same level class may have the similar idea in teamwork, cognition,.. so they may feel comfortable when corporating with each others However in this case, the skilled and genius pupils may graduate sooner than their peer. This can be seen as biased for the student which can raise many debatable from their parents. Similarly, the students rarely know the way helping the inferior people which lead to the far-reaching repercussions in the following days.
Considering an opposed type of class, educational systems at the present day have a tendency for create a mixed class based on a range of its benefit. To be clear, student may have a opportunity to interact and learn with different level which is quite similar as the working environment in their future career. Moreover, teacher don't need to teach quickly or slowly for any individuals and school just need only one curriculum in educating their pupils. Every student has equivalent chance to access the lesson and schoolwork with various levels and avoid the egotistic problems in skilled students. Thanks to this meaning class, inferior student may have effort to practice in order to reach a higher level.
In conclusion, separated class or mixed class has their own merits. The former class may accelerate the studying process of cultured students but it may cause an injustice in learning environment. It is evident that the mixed class can help us gain more advatages while it is not a perfect pedagogic method.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...discussing whether the school should or shouldnt divide students based on their academic...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... the similar idea in teamwork, cognition,.. so they may feel comfortable when corp...
^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...the similar idea in teamwork, cognition,.. so they may feel comfortable when corpo...
^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... similar idea in teamwork, cognition,.. so they may feel comfortable when corporat...
^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... benefit. To be clear, student may have a opportunity to interact and learn with ...
^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... their future career. Moreover, teacher dont need to teach quickly or slowly for any...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, third, thirdly, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11621621622 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62338892785 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556756756757 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7101844536 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.166666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174410595756 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602814136238 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568727381382 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113583676935 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460238003794 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.