Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication. do benefits of this outweigh the problems
To overcome the obstacles of communication all over the world, a new globally recognized language is needed which has led a group of people to invent a new language.
While there are some negative consequences of this development, i would argue that these are outweighed by the advantages.
On the one hand, there are numerous benefits to acquiring the knowledge of a new language. Firstly, it can exceed the challenges to build the network among the world. As the technologies are advanced, it is necessary to exchange information, ideas and researh with others. For example, while vaccine of COVID-19 was invented by the German company, they diffused the formula and vaccines throughout the all countries including poor and rich. Without proper networking and communication, this would not have been possible. In this case, learning new language is necessary. Secondly, learning new language creates the opportunity to gather in deep knowledge about the new culture and traditions. This can foster geographical and cultural knowledge. Moreover, to study in abroad, a new globally recognized language should have know to coomunicate with student and teacher. Nowadays different language assessment exams are taken to check the ability the knowledge of the language.
On ther other hand, there are diverse languages available in different countries. A single language can not be sufficient to communicate and learn properly about the culture and traditions. Additionally, it is very arduous and time-consuming to capture knowledge, grammar, and pronunciation of a foreign language.
In conclusion, inventing a new language for global communication is very effective. Although the task is laborious, it can bring success in different ways and increase the ample abilities that outweigh its drawbacks. I believe every person should learn at least one foreign language.
- The graphs below show the total percentage of films released and the total percentage of ticket sales in 1996 and 2006 in a country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows four methods of dealing with waste in four countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little 66
- The graphs below show the different reasons of two groups of students to choose Dorrifod University Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The line graph shows the average prices of tickets sold at a theatre and the bar chart shows the average percentage of tickets sold in 2010 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 65, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: i is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ative consequences of this development, i would argue that these are outweighed b...
^
Line 4, column 824, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...lobally recognized language should have know to coomunicate with student and teacher...
^^^^
Line 8, column 218, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... abilities that outweigh its drawbacks. I believe every person should learn at le...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, at least, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51736111111 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10673481573 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9566213209 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2777777778 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289839883958 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843264452185 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728153128976 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157476232384 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05026214028 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.