Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

People have different views about whether vital positions in the government should be taken by young adults. While high-level positions have been taken up by people with many years of work experience, I agree with those who believe that the government should also employ the youth as some important positions.

There is a key reason why the government should not hire young officials. In many people’s minds, the young generation is thought to be immature and inexperienced. If in charge of important departments, they might easily make decisions without thorough consideration, which may lead to dire consequences. A good example is that, the foreign affairs minister needs to quickly and properly handle the problems that may come from all over the world every minute. Without the rich experience collected from his long-time service in this field, it would be unlikely for him to fulfill his duties. Therefore, young people are not really suitable for this kind of government positions.

In spite of the above arguments, I support the view that young people should be given more opportunities to get involved in government work. The main benefit of hiring them is that they are open-minded, creative and willing to solve problems with new methods. In other words, if they notice that there are effective systems which are newly proposed, they will assess these systems instead of being confined by original measures. For instance, the education ministry and tourism bureau should be led by young people who are inspiring and innovating. They would be enthusiastic about using imaginative ways to attract students’ and visitors’ interests, which may lead to unexpected benefits.

In conclusion, experienced people are obviously appropriate for high-level government positions, but the young are equally essential for these positions.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-18 idid382002 84 view
2019-09-19 rookiewriter 73 view
2019-09-19 rookiewriter 67 view
2019-09-19 rookiewriter 67 view
2019-05-15 Jenny213987 89 view
Essays by user rookiewriter :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he youth as some important positions. A key reason exist to support the idea t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or this kind of government positions. In spite of the above arguments, I suppo...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich may lead to unexpected benefits. In conclusion, experienced people are ob...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in other words, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51811594203 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95888962793 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8572344321 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32155815024 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116858669425 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106576407799 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230628989918 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655945648279 0.056905535591 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.