Some teachers say students should be organised into groups to study Others argue that students should be made to study alone Tell the benefits of each study method Which one do you think is more effective

Essay topics:

Some teachers say students should be organised into groups to study. Others argue that students should be made to study alone. Tell the benefits of each study method. Which one do you think is more effective?

Many tutors, nowadays, are more highlighting the group study as a better way of learning, however, for others study in isolation is more effective. However, both methods have own positive points.

There are many reasons why educationalists are tending to group study, one of which development of negotiation skills is most prominent. By this way of education one learner is not only become good at subjects but also inculcates skills like how to agree or disagree with others' opinions, how to put own point? Another positive point is doubt solving at a rapid pace. As one can resolve his conflicts by asking it directly to their classmates or teachers.

Definitely, there are some merits of study alone too. First and most obvious one is time-saving. In this strategy adolescents have more time to focus on their own progress rather than considering others' point of view. As a result, they can more concentrate on their study and get good results. Pupils become more self-dependent due to the fact there is no other helping hand to mitigate their hurdles. This resulting in students with competitive minds.

In my opinion, despite both strategies have their own advantages, one individual not help to make productive students. Teachers should apply each method as necessity arises such as mathematics, physics can be taught by the latter and for boring subjects like history, the former method is more suitable.

In conclusion, yet studying in bunch and in isolation have their own significance, they should be applied as requirements arise.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-15 noodles_in_love 56 view
2021-10-04 maulik beladiya 61 view
Essays by user maulik beladiya :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85587493913 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4780044515 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263648232099 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809248242242 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681224805488 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145319025658 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044994364006 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.