Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Some believe it is crucial for university students to dedicate all their time and concentration to studying for a qualification, while other students want to improve their knowledge in other subjects further than their main subjects. The following paragraphs will discuss both these views and elaborate on why I firmly agree with the students who want to learn more subjects.
The Syllabi of universities are defined by well-educated professors who are experts in their careers. They are completely aware of what students should learn and what subjects are irrelevant to their courses. Consequently, if there are not many subjects in university courses, it means students will not need these extra subjects in the future. Furthermore, students should focus on their limited subjects to become a master in them, which helps them to gain experience and become a qualified person for companies which are going to hire them.
On the other hand, gaining more information will enhance students' attitudes toward many aspects of science. In this way, they can combine these new data with regular university subjects and help them to answer many mysterious science questions or improve science. For example, an engineer who learned about AI can use this state-of-the-art technique to produce a higher-quality machine. In addition, companies are looking for applicants who have many other skills as well as the regular ones that were taught in universities. So, learning new subjects might help students to be prone to other rivals to get a better rewarding job.
Although focusing on the main subjects is important, finding a better job is getting much more difficult in comparison to previous decades, so students should be qualified to do more things. In addition, university syllabi are not revised frequently, so students need to get updated information by learning more.
To sum up, I strongly believe students should go beyond the university subjects and learn more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-07 | Tường Vân | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-21 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2024-03-21 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-03-18 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-08 | Nina Tsarevich | 73 | view |
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information State which you consider to be the most effective Comics Books radios television films theatre 73
- Transport delays and long journey times are a widespread phenomenon in many cities today What are the causes of this problem and how could the situation be improved 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their level of health and fitness is decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 73
- All education and healthcare should be funded by the government and free for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some psychologists think that the best way to overcome the stress of everyday life is to spend a portion of the day doing absolutely nothing To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...are defined by well-educated professors who are experts in their careers. They are comp...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, look, so, well, while, for example, in addition, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29392971246 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89789919053 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539936102236 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1123422403 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.357142857 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412988296617 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142565325471 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972416422095 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243497724006 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123833413067 0.056905535591 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...are defined by well-educated professors who are experts in their careers. They are comp...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, look, so, well, while, for example, in addition, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29392971246 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89789919053 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539936102236 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1123422403 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.357142857 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412988296617 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142565325471 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972416422095 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243497724006 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123833413067 0.056905535591 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.