Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both view and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some young people look forward to a year of travelling, a gap year, before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons. For others this is an expensive waste of time. Discuss both view and give your own opinion.

In the recent year, certain young citizens opt for a gap year before decided to studying at a university or choosing a job. They argue that this is an opportunity for them to understand themselves and the world before getting serious. However, other people believe that this is not a great idea and people are squandering their resources. From my perspective, both arguments have a fair point, and I will further elaborate in this essay.

Most people have to choose a career or a major to follow after graduate from high school, however, it is not everyone know exactly who they want to be in the future. Therefore, a gap year is a great solution for those people to figure it out. By traveling to various places, people are exposed to different cultures and offered a chance to reflect themselves. For instances, after traveling and seeing hapless people in Africa, a teenager, who have not decide what career he want to pursuit, might want to be a politician. In addition, since they are traveling and interacting with a lot of people, various social skills and soft skills might be obtained which could beneficial later on.

On the other hand, for those who already know exactly what they want in the future, this gap year is surely unnecessary. Instead of spending time and money on something would do no good for them, these people could focus on their goals either in career or in studying. To be a doctor in most of the fields, for example, would take people six to eight years of studying until they are officially become an expert. Thus, spending a year for traveling would a superfluity to them.

In conclusion, I feel that traveling for one year is certainly necessary for certain people and if it is affordable they should take it, however it is not essential for those who have had make their mind about their future.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-06 anh801 78 view
2022-03-26 linhlinh11 73 view
2022-03-17 namviet 67 view
2022-02-25 Ngoc Trinh 89 view
2021-12-15 akorn99 89 view
Essays by user akorn99 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'decided'.
Suggestion: decided
...ple in Africa, a teenager, who have not decide what career he want to pursuit, might w...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...ger, who have not decide what career he want to pursuit, might want to be a politici...
^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'made'.
Suggestion: made
...is not essential for those who have had make their mind about their future.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72049689441 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56735957957 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524844720497 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8922016828 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31517653454 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117421260176 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541984105487 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205432907155 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572807539477 0.056905535591 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.