In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this case What can be done about this problem

Essay topics:

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this case?
What can be done about this problem?

According to statistics, nowadays about 7.5 billion humans live in the world. Some people argue that although, agriculture have been developed, many people fight with starving. In my opinion the cause of this problem is density of people and infrastructure. The solution can be increased harvest rate and building farmlands near to the cities.
Regarding to the density of some counties such as Chine or India, the population of this king of countries needs a great number of food supply. The more people the more demand to nutritious. In this case I think farmers should increase the volume of harvest. Furthermore, they might offer the diverse type of grocery foods to residents. Also, an increase in the amount of harvest can improve the capability of government to export them. The income can be spent in agriculture kin order to next development.
Moreover, the second significant reason in deficit of food is transport infrastructure. While nourishments travel from farmland to stores, the food mile influences in cost, also the quality of food, simultaneously, making food more costly. In that case, the government should be agreed in constructing layouts of farmland near to the cities. While the distance between supplier and receiver close to each other it reduces the price of food, and even poor people can afford themselves to buy them. Also, if delivers use hybrid cars, this not only save spending to transportation, but also makes positive effect on the environment.
To sum up, while the world suffers from starving, I think the cause of this situation is transport system and the density of inhabitants. The solution can be an increase in yield and a relocation farmlands.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-28 Ahmad Rifki Hardiansyah 61 view
2023-06-28 Risti 61 view
2022-09-03 atule 84 view
2022-06-10 quyvo123 11 view
2022-02-21 fat_400 84 view
Essays by user Shakhzod Yodgorov :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, while, i think, such as, in my opinion, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12274368231 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91241557835 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584837545126 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1371412504 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4705882353 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2941176471 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221956539506 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694878329887 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476299412474 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146107458493 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625835816134 0.056905535591 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.