In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this case? What can be done about this problem?
Impact of not having enough food on people are one of the most topics provoking controversies in around the world. Some people state that agricultural developments could be of great benefit to servicing for food while others claim that many people still do not have enough food to eat. From my point of view, overpopulation is one of the factors and it should be seriously handled.
In reality, there is a growing consensus of opinion on the causes of increasingly inhabitants. One of the most striking points to mention is people’s lack of work. Apparently, developments of farming which mean that life in country is improved are responsible for increase of unit of currency leads to buying food is difficult for people who do not have job. Another critical factor which directly leads to this problem is that volume of demand of food is more than number of production result lack of victuals. In addition, as a consequence of lack of rigor of policy of government can have a negative influence on reproduction in family.
Firstly, governments need to introduce legislation, policies, and guidelines in order to ensure that every resistant can have opportunities to get a job. In fact, imposing certain restrictions on family planning is often regarded as an effective solution to most issues at both macro and micro levels. Secondly, authority can financially assist project and campaigns in expanded industrial area through the public budget. For example, inhabitants in countryside which is place have poverty of chance of finding a work can easily to get one with building a new office.
In conclusion, it is apparent from the arguments above that overpopulation is outcome of people’s starving. Nonetheless, compared with most other social issues, under different circumstances, building new area of office and make sure resident can have a job need to be flexibly evaluated.
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sports or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views an 84
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this case What can be done about this problem 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: CONSENSUS_OF_OPINION[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...andled. In reality, there is a growing consensus of opinion on the causes of increasingly inhabitan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 354, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...is difficult for people who do not have job. Another critical factor which directly...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, firstly, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13961038961 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02533819472 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3298079559 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.071428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139761143135 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435981886828 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371829139728 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806033671716 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429819520478 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: CONSENSUS_OF_OPINION[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...andled. In reality, there is a growing consensus of opinion on the causes of increasingly inhabitan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 354, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...is difficult for people who do not have job. Another critical factor which directly...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, firstly, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13961038961 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02533819472 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3298079559 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.071428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139761143135 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435981886828 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371829139728 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806033671716 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429819520478 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.