In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem

Essay topics:

In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?

In recent years, the problem of even when developing in agriculture, there are still many cases that people suffer famine has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Notwithstanding this issue can be attributed to a whole host of reasons, there are som flexible solution taken into account to deal with.
There are a number of reasons why many people tend to go hungry despite the advances in agriculture. Firstly, since these advances are conducted in the developed and developing countries, non-develop nations d not have condition, facilities and infrastructure to improve the agricultural aspect. In other words, by the original cultivation, citizens of such countries often harvest crops following by seasons, thus, if there are natural disasters, namely storms and typhoons, they would not prevent and cope with the damages, which leads to destroyed fields and no collected products. Secondly, the main reason for the hungry of some is that they have no money to pay for food and drinks. In fact, even whether there are a myriad of products from agriculture, they will be exported to other countries instead of giving to poor people, making the problem of famine more serious.
In addition, this issue can be tackled by some solutions for the governments and the international institutions. In terms of national scale. the governments should create more opportunities of employment for their inhabitants, which not only helps poor citizens earn a living and support their families, but also they can have more money to consume agricultural products of their countries. Therefore, these advantages are beneficial to the economic development of such nations as the rise of GPA. For an international perspective, developed and developing countries can assist advanced technology in agriculture for non-develop ones by aiding technological devices, guiding how to plant in greenhouses, etc... Therefore, poor countries have chances to expose to new cultivating methods, improving the quality of agricultural manufacture and the addition of inspiring global relationship among nations.
In conclusion, there are a number of cases suffering famine even in spite of the development of agriculture, caused by many apparent reasons, it will have numerous solutions to address.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-20 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-01-20 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-01-06 Ahmad_off 67 view
2023-12-05 huong789 67 view
2023-09-12 Nowshin Tabassum 61 view
Essays by user lynkchillie0911 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 724, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...inks. In fact, even whether there are a myriad of products from agriculture, they will...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nts and the international institutions. In terms of national scale. the government...
^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...stitutions. In terms of national scale. the governments should create more opportun...
^^^
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...chnology in agriculture for non-develop ones by aiding technological devices, guidin...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in other words, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43943661972 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09684970248 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557746478873 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.9922691824 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.928571429 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194130675868 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677474403963 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661080318482 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120251221818 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404757286314 0.056905535591 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.