in spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
why is this the case?
what can be done about this problem?
Recently, although by growing the technology most governments use the advances agriculture to produce various yields most people of societies cannot provide their nutrients in whole of the world. In my opinion, this happens because first world countries and advances countries don’t share their knowledge about agriculture to other countries. There are various effective ways that can be done to solve this problem.
One the one hand, universal weather is getting warm because of the lack of enough water most countries plant or schedule harvesting. Hence, most of agriculture lands have become dry. to prevent this issue nations should use drip irrigation to produce crops in such weather condition. It is one of the most effective ways that can be used in drought situation.
On the other hand, there are lots of pests than can damage harvests in whole of the world that reduce rate of product. It is important to use appropriate pesticides to keep harvests far from infections. Industrial countries use the best Pesticides but selling them is very expensive that nations cannot afford. They also not sharing their knowledge with other countries. Therefore, governments should provide Pesticides if they have other preventing measures.
Finally, farmers prefer to have traditional equipments during their agricultural process instead of highly equipped tools that can both save energy and increase the rate of product. Some of these equipments are difficult to be used and should have enough knowledge yet many farmers don’t know any thig about them. For preventing this issue they should learn how to use them.
In conclusion, I think governments can solve hunger problem if they consider the mentioned methods.
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'advances'' or 'advance's'?
Suggestion: advances'; advance's
...the technology most governments use the advances agriculture to produce various yields m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...t of agriculture lands have become dry. to prevent this issue nations should use d...
^^
Line 4, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssue they should learn how to use them. In conclusion, I think governments can s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, so, therefore, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34191176471 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67454833606 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555147058824 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4490934008 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8125 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192207741781 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651028967019 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691890942761 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109039305651 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855939917337 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.