In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
While many significant agricultural breakthroughs are made and successfully applied to promote food production, there are still millions of people who do not have enough food to eat daily in many parts of the world. In my opinion, two key elements are causing the food shortage, and governments and individuals in the community could do more to address this issue.
Firstly, one of the main reasons for the lack of food in particular places might be the natural conditions that directly affect the results and productivity of farming. Without any doubt, many areas where hot temperatures and the lack of rains extend around the year face further difficulties in food production than the others. Thus, their population living there usually must struggle to have enough food to survive. Secondly, policies and taxes for agriculture could lead to barriers in distributing their agricultural product and approaching food supplies. Hunger and mid-traders also make it unequal and difficult for people to purchase food, although those products could be sufficient in other places. When it comes to environmental and human factors, it is recognized that many people hardly have the opportunity to eat.
Having said that, there are various steps that governments and each citizen could take to tackle these problems. If local authorities whose areas are extremely severe drought could spend a financial budget investing agricultural science suited to their particular condition, the food shortage would less happen. In addition, the government should implement laws about stable prices and taxes reasonably not only for food but also for their distribution in order for the population to buy food more easily. To receive enough food at reasonable prices, individuals in the public could also directly contribute their money to invest in farming.
In conclusion, both governments and each person in the community could certainly implement a range of measures to enhance and ensure global food distribution. Because of the advances of science-technology considered supportive measures, humans mainly play a crucial role in changing the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | shalin63 | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | ielts_tony | 67 | view |
| 2022-05-03 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | Lunar Tran | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-26 | pateldhruv1708 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that having criminal people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about the dangers of committing a crime Do you agree or disagree 73
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The uses of mobile phone have a lot of negative impacts on social medical and technical problems What are the problems of using mobile phone Do you think that using mobile phone is negative 89
- Some people think saving money is good but others think that spending money is a better way to enjoy life Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge 67
- Some people think family has the most powerful influence on children s development Others however believe that other things have greater effects Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fr 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43373493976 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95275986595 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596385542169 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3056347503 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.857142857 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123068576628 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441543294146 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333553582869 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762220402605 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034296713988 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.