In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?

Essay topics:

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?

It is true that although there are many breakthrough in the industry of agriculture, such as high-tech machineries in farming, there are still millions of people starving in the world. I believe that corruption and poverty are the main reason of why this is happening and local and international governments joint effort are needed to tackle the issue.

There are obvious reasons why despite of the agricultural advancements, many people still sleeping in an empty stomach. Firstly, corruption is rampant in the developing countries. Instead of spending people's money on purchasing high technology equipment that speeds up farming process, politicians prefers projects that will greatly benefit them such as unnecessary reconstruction of buildings and infrastructures in the city. Secondly, the number of low-income group families are increasing and because of this, many still lives in poverty everywhere. With growing children in the family, expenses are rising as children basic needs such as education and clothing must be provided. More often that not, the budget on food is the least priority as it compensates for other important expenses in the family. Lastly, the food wastage in the wealthy nations has a great impact in the food supply and demand of the world.

The solution to his problem must be addresses appropriately by the local authorities and with the help of international aids aswell. The local government should Provide financial assistances to the indigent families. They should also support poor children who are determined to raise their family from poverty. By doing this, the cycle of poverty will stop within this family as the children will be able to support their family financially in the future. The rich nations can provide grants aswell to under developed countriess to update and advice their farming methods. This will ensure that more produce will be a available to the people.

In conclusion, the corrupt officials sitting in the government post causes more starving citizens and dragging them down to poverty, but through financial aid of both loal and international level, we hope that there will be less hungry people everywhere.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-27 BIBHU KALITA 67 view
2020-01-24 yasamin27 67 view
2020-01-15 Iruki 78 view
2020-01-03 aria etemadi 56 view
2019-11-29 JiaYanLi 73 view
Essays by user Anamia :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun breakthrough seems to be countable; consider using: 'many breakthroughs'.
Suggestion: many breakthroughs
It is true that although there are many breakthrough in the industry of agriculture, such as...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'breakthroughs'?
Suggestion: breakthroughs
...It is true that although there are many breakthrough in the industry of agriculture, such as...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 617, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s will ensure that more produce will be a available to the people. In conclusi...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, well, in conclusion, such as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32173913043 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86841434981 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6865541244 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197419200193 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058323394958 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524525990195 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115480810333 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490651509363 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.