In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem?

Essay topics:

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?

The cutting-edge tech of the modern era has not only made life much easier and convenient, but also has greatly reduced the efforts required in many works. One of such area is the agriculture which has flourished immensely, even though; there have been no significant changes in number of starving people of the world. Here, I will be digging up the roots of dilemma and some plausible cures.

As regards to the origin of this mess, the ruling one is presence of multiple intermediaries in the market which help the general public to avail food at their homes or at a specific location. To instantiate, farmers grow food in their fields, sell it to producer, from whom wholesaler and retailers buy the product to vend it consumer. Following the lead is the inflation in the prices of good which is either done by government or companies to preserve food for the time of scarcity or for earning profits, however, this makes it very less feasible for impoverish to enjoy the luxury of one basic need of life. Moreover, factors like import and export, availability of viver in locality, currency of exchange. A leading example is trade between US and India, in which, latter often bring in provisions not being produced in domestic market and selling unique food of the country to former nation at hefty prices. All these reasons contribute to starvation of population around the world as farmers, most of the time, do not get right price of their producer and end user require well-maintained figure of money to always avail it, while the only ones benefiting from all of it are the distributors.

Latching onto curatives of the malady, these are actually quite simple with some major minor drawbacks. The prepotent and most straightforward is to remove or lessen the number of arbitrators from the trade and directly provide food from farmers to consumer, although, it might diminish employment opportunities. Therefore, it is never seen in any market or country around the world. The more reasonable one is providing subsidies on the goods to people, respective to their income and letting farmer to keep some reserves of cultivated goods along with selling rest of these at tenable prices. For instance, income tax is charged according to earnings of a person in India and if the same can be applied to food subsidies, then certainly, it will be boon for many. Another solution is promoting domestic market goods more than foreign ones, despite it not being much influential.

To reiterate, famine is not something which can be cleanse in a one go, it require some careful and rational steps with the support from every possible person such as researchers, public, authorities, scientists and so on.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 aghasaeed 78 view
2020-01-27 geforce 61 view
2020-01-25 Noah1997 78 view
2020-01-08 yasinyucesan 95 view
2020-01-02 choco_fans 11 view
Essays by user Breaker36 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rmediaries in the market which help the general public to avail food at their homes or at a sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'requires'?
Suggestion: requires
...ng which can be cleanse in a one go, it require some careful and rational steps with th...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, as regards, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 41.998997996 181% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 456.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94298245614 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.755709119 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 176.041082164 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.5667709971 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.875 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112565809191 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337774159949 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267858120637 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068291474666 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00989655475843 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.