Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things.
What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to reduce the time children spend on watching TV and encourage children to spend more time on active or creative things?
It is argued that, in recent years, children no longer spend more their time on social activities or create things rather than watching TV. This essay will look at some primary reasons for this phenomenon and offer some possible solutions to the problem
Several causes can contribute to this trend. The first reason is that today’s parents do not seem to have much time to care for and supervise their children due to their busy schedule work. Many parents, for example, have to work 10 to 12 hours a day so they might not know what their kids do after school. In addition to this, some programmes on TV are as an addiction substance like cartoon and heavy exposure with those programs enable kids to be gradually immersed in it. As a result, they may spend time watching TV instead of participating in outdoor activities, which results in isolating people and discourage real world.
Practical solutions can be done to mitigate the problems mentioned above. Firstly, parents should have a work-life balance so that they have time to educate their childrenn about the danger of spending more time sedentary activities such as watching TV, when they are fully-aware of this, they can avoid excessive exposure to watching TV. Secondly, parents need to restrict their children’s movie time. Kids may participate in other activities when their hours spent watching TV are limited
In conclusion, there are various factors leading to children who spend more time watching TV than other activities and measures can be implemented to tackle this issue
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-20 | an@123 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Ng Minh Chau | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | cassiexo | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | cassiexo | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Nguyenx Trần Minh Trí | view |
- the table below highlights data on the number of travelers using three major british airports between 1998 in 2003 84
- the graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030
- the diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drink cans 87
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to reduce the time children spend on watching TV and encourag 73
- the diagram below show how tomato ketchup is made 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir hours spent watching TV are limited In conclusion, there are various factors...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02713178295 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57823036181 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.8980126872 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.7 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379334655895 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14671351449 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108787581559 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256945652294 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501052814783 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.