Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.
Why do you think this is the case?
What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Nowadays, more and more teenagers tend to choose online plarforms as their way to communicate while the traditional face-to-face interaction is being forgotten, which leads to several drawbacks.
It cannot be denied that thanks to the advanced technology these days, people can connect with others effortlessly through the internet despite time and distance. Students studying abroad, for instance, can have the access to contact their friends and parents in their hometown with little to none cost, as long as they are connected online. Also, with the domination of a variety of social media platforms nowadays, adolescents receive more opportunities to either chat with their friends online or express themselves on social network, such as Facebook and Instagram. The usefulness of online network during the global pandemic at the moment is another example of such advantages the internet can bring. Not only it allows adults to have the accessible way to work from home, but also students can benefit as online classes are arranged to ensure students learning progress at school. However, millenials and gen-Z generations tend to overuse the internet and underestimate the drawbacks of doing so, which leads to numerous issues that need to be dealt with.
In order to balance teenagers' online and offline social life, parents play an important role in educating their children to experience the real world outdoor by meeting new people and spending time one relatives and friends outside. Also, governments should consider investing on structuring playgrounds or events for the youth in order to attract them to step out of their artificial world and interact with real life people. For example, in Vietnam, more and more walking streets are being built to bring people together thanks to their creativity in terms of creating activities for others to join. The results they have brought are surprisingly beneficial. Despite a huge amount of time and money needed for the project, it can bring numerous advantages to teenagers and later generations.
To conclude, balancing between interacting outdoor and connecting with people through online platforms is needed for adolescents in order to obtain decent productivity with high performance.
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 78
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 868, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to progress'
Suggestion: to progress
...re arranged to ensure students learning progress at school. However, millenials and gen-...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one relative', 'a relative', or simply 'relatives'?
Suggestion: one relative; a relative; relatives
...by meeting new people and spending time one relatives and friends outside. Also, governments ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42165242165 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77622427156 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566951566952 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.0055727777 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.384615385 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126596650637 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451930535137 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404938429893 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074963272791 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375332623432 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.