Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, thanks to the technological advance, online courses gain increasing popularity in many countries. While many advocate this trend, personnally I believe that learning in a classroom is far more effective since it facilitates the development in soft skills of students and guarantees higher academic results compared to online learning.
For once, the tradition learning is more beneficial since it can greatly enhace the students' interpersonnel skills. In ordinary classes, students have more chances to communicate and cooperate. By contrast, online classes always lack of interaction, which subsquently makes students inactive and socially withdrawn. A survey conducted in my country, for instance, indicates students' negative approach to social interaction after a long time studying online due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Most of them seemed to show anti-social tendency and reluctance to communicate while coming back to school. This survey is a salient example on how greatly traditional classes benefit students in terms of soft skills.
Futhermore, online courses show a lower academic efficiency compared to traditional classes. While students learning in classes are under a rigorous guidance of teachers, they no longer have rules to follow in online courses. In fact, students studying at home often face many distractions during learning time, which adversely affects their learning. Take me as an example, during my online classes, I easily lost my concentration due to many reasons, such as: outside noises, pets, members in my family. Consequently, my grades went down significantly and I even received many complaints from my teachers. However, this situation was immediately improved after I could participate in ordinary classes. For most students, like me, the traditional classrooms are still the optimal option as it gurantees a much better results.
In conclusion, I firmly believe the ordinary classes clearly outweigh the online learning for its ability to improve students' soft skills and academic results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 78
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 78
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advocate seems to be countable; consider using: 'many advocates'.
Suggestion: many advocates
...ing popularity in many countries. While many advocate this trend, personnally I believe that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65584415584 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98984902068 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594155844156 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0649767301 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200370355325 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661856568671 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525789272797 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122923092993 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210915954156 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.