Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems?
Despite the world’s economic advance, many people still suffer from the growing disparity between the wealthy and the poor. Personally I believe that the primary implication of this phenomenon is increasing social tensions and conflicts and some changes in tax regulation can effectively tackle this problem.
The most adverse result of economic inequality is social instability. The poor, in fact, often perceive the rich as an evil entity which chronically exploits them for profit and is a big hindrance to their happy life, leading to aggression and hostility. An example is the character depiction in many stories in Vietnam literature. While the rich people are often viewed as greedy and callous villains, the protagonists of the story are always impoverished. There is always an underlying fight of the poor against the rich representing social conflicts happening in real life. Without a doubt, a wide gap between rich and poor people imposes a threat to the safety and stability of society.
In my opinion, introducing laws regarding wealth distribution or taxation is an effective measure to combat economic inequality. People having higher income have to pay a much higher tax, which is subsequently employed to provide welfare for the poor such as free accommodation, free access to education. In Vietnam, for example, the authorities have carried out this initiative for years receiving many positive results. There is no demonstration happening and the living standard of the poor is greatly improved by the support of richer people, resulting in a stable and happy society, The success in Vietnam is a salient example on how a few changes in
regulation regarding taxation can narrow the gap between the wealthy and the poor.
In conclusion, I hold a firm belief that a progressive tax and welfare system can soon eradicate economic inequality and its consequences, such as: social tension and conflicts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | NUT | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 78
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Which is the most important cultural identifier or the feature that defines your cultural identity 95
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 656, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... salient example on how a few changes in regulation regarding taxation can narrow...
^^^
Line 6, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... such as: social tension and conflicts.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28990228013 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9411642626 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5667752443 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4405952572 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.923076923 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266722309639 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878378465306 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738732771644 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136870955221 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740262069679 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.