To succeed in a business, one needs to know maths.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that to be successful in business, people should have a good understanding of mathematics. I completely agree with this sentiment due to the following reasons.
To begin with, mathematics plays an important role in a large number of occupations related to business. Particularly, these days, recruiters often look for a candidate who is proficient in statistics, analysis and other fields included in maths. For example, numerous careers such as sales, business analysis or company directors require knowledge of mathematics. As a result, employees who are good at this field could have more employment opportunities. Meanwhile, spending time on this subject would help people improve other necessary skills at the same time. Some researchers show that people having the ability to solve a maths’ problem are likely to enhance their decision-making or problem-solving skills. Clearly, these skills may give them a great chance to prosper their business.
Despite these benefits, some people still claim that mathematics is not as crucial as others say. They may think this subject is too theoretical to apply in real life. However, I strongly believe that mathematics can be utilised in different practical situations. To be specific, this subject provides people with knowledge about not only numbers and formulas but also fractions, decimals, percentages, statistics or probability. These skills are essential for a businessman to calculate his company’s sales, revenues, expenditure and create strategies for the future. It seems that mathematics is an integral aspect of people's daily work-related tasks.
To sum up, although some people still doubt the importance of mathematics, I am of the view that this subject contributes greatly to occupation’s success since it helps people gain more job chances, improve other interpersonal skills as well as manage their business.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 67
- The charts below show the internet use in different purposes in Australia in 2010 2011 and the percentage by users Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- The graph shows the amount of fruit produced in four countries France Spain Germany Turkey from 1970 to 2010 61
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... mathematics plays an important role in a large number of occupations related to business. Partic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kills as well as manage their business.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, still, well, while, for example, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58965517241 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14819088151 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631034482759 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1441520332 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.3125 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0215879282457 0.244688304435 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00810199388322 0.084324248473 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0172919658346 0.0667982634062 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.015685421893 0.151304729494 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159772190556 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.